Anyone desiring clarity about what drives me should read this thoroughly and carefully.
Before it is possible to understand what I mean when I say I don’t care about morals, it is necessary to understand what are “morals”.
Morals are principles which apply to anecdotes in very specific accounts, either real or imagined. For instance the moral of the story about the frog who tried to take the scorpion across the river on his back is that it should be expected that the frog would be stung.
Morals have a very limited usefulness for people who are too immature or too cognitively limited to do a simple ethical analysis of every single decision they make. Morals are cookie cutter solutions to classes of problems which may be applied if you lack the ability or wherewithal to fully analyze the end results of all possible choices you could make in a given situation. Morals can be useful to explain one’s ethical analysis in a few words without having to explain the countless details which have been considered.
So since I’m not a third grader and I have the cognitive capacity to assess in significantly greater detail than average, every plausible choice at every important juncture, I therefore do not care about morals. They are sometimes useful in communicating my reasons after the decision was made, but they are never useful in the analysis proper.
My analysis of important issues contemplates every reasonable choice from the perspective of every individual including the theoretical objective observer. I then project the conceivable results across all foreseeable axes ideally to an evolutionarily stable strategy or lack thereof (aka extinction).
It is for this reason that anyone who opposes any of my or my symbiote’s aims is necessarily aiming for his own extinction. Yes I speak for something greater than myself.
Leave a Reply